

Pick a page of your intro, read it aloud and circle all the words that are MORE than 3 syllables long.
Then start at the top and highlight any jargon words that your mum wouldn’t understand.
How many long/jargony words are on your page?
Replace the long words short concrete alternatives.
Ask yourself whether the jargon is really necessary.
If it is, make sure its REALLY well defined.
1 : 5 : 25 rule. Pick a page of your intro and count the words in each sentence.
How long is your longest sentence?
How many sentences do you have that are more than 25 words long?
Edit out the “fuzz”. How many words can you delete from the long sentences and have them still make sense?
If your sentences are still too long (or contain multiple phrases), put in a full stop and split the sentence into two.
Passive voice and nominalisations
Pick a page of your intro, search (Ctrl-F) for and highlight the following passive voice red flags.
Now search (Ctrl-F) for these suffixes to find nominalisations.
Put a person doing the action back into each passive sentence.
Turn the nouns you have created back into verbs and include the people doing the action in your sentences.
The curse of knowledge means that you know what “this” (or “they” or “these”) refers to, but your reader has lost track.
Adolescents who spent more time on social media reported lower mood, but teens who used it mainly to message close friends reported higher mood than those who mostly scrolled. Parental monitoring moderated the relationship between screen time and wellbeing. This has important implications for how we support young people online, and future research should investigate this more closely.
Put your cursor at the topic of your intro and Ctrl-F “this” (and then “they”, “these”).
How many did you find?
Check that it is really clear what “this” refers to.
You can help your reader by spelling it out explicitly.
Your topic sentences are not doing their job.
Make a “topic sentence paragraph”.
Copy and paste each of the first sentence of each paragraph into a new document.
Does it read like a summary of your argument?


Find the “weak link” topic sentences and look carefully at that paragraph.
Rewrite the topic sentence, making sure it gives away
There is too much emphasis on “who” did the research and not enough detail about “what” they did (as well as what they found)
So & So (2025) found that weather impacted mood in high school students.
vs.
High schoolers surveyed on rainy days had lower scores on the DASS than high schoolers surveyed on sunny days (So & So, 2025).
Pick a page of your intro and find all the sentences that start with a Name(Date) citation.
How many of those are missing any mention of method?
Your marker cannot see the CRITICAL ANALYSIS you are doing, if you don’t write about method.
As you get down your funnel, check that for every study you write about, you are talking about what participants were asked to do AS WELL AS what they study found.
WARNING: the closer you are to your writing, the harder it is to see where it is not working

These slides are available at…
www.revealresearch.org