These slides available at
https://jennyslides.netlify.app/writing/
These slides available at
https://jennyslides.netlify.app/writing/
Jump into the google doc, pick a font colour, write continuously about why you find it hard to get started on writing projects. Don't stop to edit, just get ideas down.
Lets do that again... this time about your next assignment. Start with....
“I don’t know anything at all about [insert something related to your assignment]... I need to understand more about it because... I do know that... I think that I need to read more about...”
Write about what you DON’T know, what you DO know, what you need to learn, how you feel about it.
Kick start your writing session by writing about ...
... mindlessly
Jump in the google doc, pick a font colour, and share the kinds of comments that tutors tend to make on your assignments.
You can prevent these comments by asking yourself 6 questions about your own writing.
The first sentence of every paragraph should give the reader the take home message.
It should be a general statement summarising a particular part of the literature.
A study conducted by Phillips and colleagues (2015) found that participants aged 65-86 performed significantly worse than younger groups on tasks assessing comprehension of sarcastic exchanges. Interestingly, there was no effect of age on the understanding of sincere exchanges (Phillips et al, 2015). Further, a meta-analysis across 23 theory of mind (TOM) studies showed that older adults performed worse on TOM tasks compared to younger groups (Henry, Phillips, Ruffman, & Bailey, 2013).
Research has shown a link between aging and social cognition. For example, Phillips and colleagues (2015) found that while participants aged 65-86 had no problem understanding sincere exchanges, they found it more difficult to understand sarcastic exchanges than did young adults (Phillips et al, 2015). This result is consistent with a recent meta-analysis of theory of mind studies, which showed that older adults performed worse on TOM tasks compared to younger groups (Henry, Phillips, Ruffman, & Bailey, 2013).
As we age, our ability to understand how other people are feeling and what other people are thinking declines. For example, Phillips and colleagues (2015) found that while participants aged 65-86 had no problem understanding sincere exchanges, they found it more difficult to understand sarcastic exchanges than did young adults (Phillips et al, 2015). This result is consistent with a recent meta-analysis of theory of mind studies, which showed that older adults performed worse on TOM tasks compared to younger groups (Henry, Phillips, Ruffman, & Bailey, 2013).
You should be able to paste the topic sentences together into a paragraph and it should read like a summary of your argument.
When it comes to writing, most experts agree that clarity, simplicity and parsimony are ideals that authors should strive for. However, most of us can likely recall having read papers, either by colleagues or students, in which the author appears to be deliberately using overly complex words. There are many plausible reasons that the use of million-dollar words would lead readers to believe that an author is smart. Indeed, there is some evidence that complex vocabulary can be indicative of a more intelligent author.
So & So (2014) did a study that involved X and found that Y. In addition, Joe & Co (2016) have found that A relates to B. Also, Big Dude and colleagues (2019) ran a study showing that manipulating X results in changes in B.
Your reader doesn't want to have to think hard. You can help them by doing the hard thinking for them.
= synthesis
Participants were recruited for a study entitled ‘Being Australian’ and completed the questionnaire in supervised groups of 10–12, and were compensated for their time with course credit. They were informed verbally and in writing that their anonymity was protected. Completed questionnaires were placed in an opaque drop box, and participants were debriefed and given the opportunity to request a summary of the results of the study (Barlow, Louis, & Hewstone, 2009, p. 394)
Participants were recruited by zombies for a study entitled ‘Being Australian’ and completed the questionnaire in supervised groups of 10–12, and were compensated by zombies for their time with course credit. They were informed verbally and in writing that their anonymity was protected by zombies. Completed questionnaires were placed in an opaque drop box by zombies, and participants were debriefed by zombies and given the opportunity to request a summary of the results of the study (Barlow, Louis, & Hewstone, 2009, p. 394)
credit Billings (2011) "Writing social psychology: Fictional things and unpopulated texts
We all know when writing is good (or not).
You can improve your own writing by being critically reflective about it.
In the google doc, you will find some bad paragraphs. In groups, use questions 1-6 to diagnose what could be improved about these paragraphs.
... and thats ok.
The Thesis Whisperer
Patricia Goodson
Keyboard shortcuts
↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
Home | Go to first slide |
End | Go to last slide |
Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
c | Clone slideshow |
p | Toggle presenter mode |
t | Restart the presentation timer |
?, h | Toggle this help |
Esc | Back to slideshow |